AI Archives - 尤物视频 /news/category/artificial-intelligence/ Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:56:57 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.5 /wp-content/uploads/2025/10/favicon-1.png AI Archives - 尤物视频 /news/category/artificial-intelligence/ 32 32 尤物视频 Law Pro recognized in the Legal Technology Awards /news/oxford-law-pro-finalist-legal-technology-awards-2026/ Fri, 11 Sep 2026 10:29:17 +0000 /?p=7767 尤物视频 Law Pro, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, is a finalist in the Legal Technology Awards.

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro recognized in the Legal Technology Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

We have been named a finalist in the .

, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has been recognized in the Responsible Use of AI in Legal Services category. This recognition follows two recent award wins in the Society for Scholarly Publishing’s EPIC Awards, for both Hosting Platform Features and Branding.

Hosted by Netlaw Media, the Legal Technology Awards recognize leadership, innovation, and technology as well as the individuals, teams, and suppliers transforming the future of legal services.

The Responsible Use of AI in Legal Services category recognizes organizations that demonstrate exemplary governance, robust risk management, and strong leadership in the ethical integration of artificial intelligence.

 

Mirkka Jokelainen, Product Portfolio Manager, said:

“Having made the list of finalists is such a meaningful recognition of OUP鈥檚 work with legal professionals, and means a lot for the whole 尤物视频 Law Pro team. AI is a tool which enables lawyers to benefit from our decades strong work of publishing the best legal commentary and analysis, and from the start, we have wanted to make sure the new capabilities enhance lawyers鈥� work and are easy to use. Responsible AI is about more than just technology. It’s about helping legal professionals access trusted expertise, realize value quickly, and adopt new capabilities with confidence.”

Winners of the Legal Technology Awards will be announced on 18 November.

About 尤物视频 Law Pro

Launched last year, 尤物视频 Law Pro brings together more than 9,000 journal articles and over 600 award-winning, peer-reviewed books from our portfolio of authoritative and timely legal analysis, all on our 尤物视频 Academic platform.

尤物视频 Law Pro is powered by a conversational AI research assistant, , making legal research more efficient without compromising on accuracy. Unlike generic AI search tools, 尤物视频 Law Pro employs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks specifically tuned for legal content, ensuring responses are grounded exclusively in OUP鈥檚 authoritative materials.

The platform equips legal professionals with tools that match the realities of modern practice, and by reducing time spent on initial source identification, the AI assistant allows them to allocate more time to substantive analysis, strategic thinking, and client service.

You can find out more about 尤物视频 Law Pro .

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro recognized in the Legal Technology Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Supporting researchers to disclose AI use with confidence /news/supporting-researchers-to-disclose-ai-use-with-confidence/ Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:00:00 +0000 /?p=7735 To help researchers to disclose their AI use confidently, we have updated our author and editor guidelines.

The post Supporting researchers to disclose AI use with confidence appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Transparent circles outlined in white over the top of a gradient of light colours

We have updated our author and editor guidelines on the responsible, appropriate, and transparent use of AI, including a policy outlining what AI use should be disclosed when preparing manuscripts for our journals.

In a recent global survey of more than 2,600 researchers, nearly three-quarters (74%) of respondents revealed they were unclear what AI use they should disclose, despite there being strong support for disclosure.

With 44% of researchers concerned that disclosing their use of AI will negatively impact how others view their work, and only 36% recording their AI use during their research, our survey emphasizes the growing gap between AI use and disclosure in academic research, and recognizes the need for clear disclosure policies.

As efforts continue to develop a , our new guidelines intend to support researchers to record and disclose their AI use with confidence. The updates to our guidelines focus on:

  • Disclosure of AI use across both books and journal articles, with authors expected to be transparent about any significant use of AI tools
  • Human oversight and accountability, with authors responsible for reviewing and verifying any AI-generated content
  • Protection of intellectual property and confidentiality to ensure care is taken when using AI tools with unpublished work, copyrighted material, or sensitive content.
Managing Director, Academic

David Clark

鈥淥ur research into AI disclosure follows our 2024 survey, which revealed a wide range of initial perceptions towards AI. Two years on, AI use is more widespread, but there remain major differences in how researchers are adopting, applying, and disclosing these tools.

鈥淎t OUP, we鈥檝e developed AI guidelines for authors with the view that the scholarship we publish must remain valued and protected. We regularly review these against industry guidelines and consider any feedback to ensure clear guidance for authors.

鈥淲e continue to prioritize working with the research community to develop clear publishing standards that support readers and authors in an AI-enabled world.鈥�

David Clark, Managing Director of OUP

Key findings from our survey:

AI is helping researchers
  • 64% of researchers report AI as beneficial to their research, with over two-thirds (68%) using AI chatbots on the open web for their research, and just under half (49%) using machine translation.
  • AI tools are most commonly used for discovering existing research (55%), summarizing existing research (46%), and editing the write-up of research (45%). Many (68%) agree that AI tools can reduce accessibility barriers, too.

“It reduces the time to locate arcane material. What might have taken hours/weeks in a library can be found instantaneously.”

  • However, 35% of those in the arts and humanities never use AI tools in their research, as opposed to 15% and 18% for STM and the social sciences, respectively.
Trust in AI is low
  • Only 20% trust AI-generated outputs. 37% of researchers who haven’t used AI for their research report concerns about accuracy, bias, and trustworthiness, and only 26% find AI-generated literature summaries to be accurate.

“My trust in AI outputs would increase if the responses consistently included clear and verifiable sources (such as case law, treaties, or academic references), showed transparent reasoning for how conclusions are reached, and accurately distinguished between established legal authority and interpretation or opinion. It would also help if the AI acknowledged uncertainty where appropriate and avoided overgeneralization, especially in complex legal or academic topics.”

  • However, 83% of those surveyed have established practices for checking citation sources generated by AI, and 80% always cross-check AI outputs for reliability.
Attitudes towards AI vary across disciplines and career stages
  • Based on respondents’ perceptions and behaviours towards AI, survey analysis identified five different profiles of researcher.
  • These range from the least trusting of AI鈥攖he ‘persistent sceptics’鈥攚ho are most commonly found in the arts and humanities, to the ‘carefree casuals’, who are less likely to record their own AI use and are more common among later career stage respondents than early career researchers.
  • Meanwhile, ‘frustrated trailblazers’ have benefited most from AI but are also the most concerned about the administrative burden of disclosing its use. They are more prevalent in the social sciences and STM disciplines, and among early career researchers.

“I am ethically opposed to AI. AI has been built on the stolen work of artists and writers. I am also concerned about the environmental consequences of AI. I grant that in some fields or in some inquiries, AI may be of some genuine use鈥攏ot in my research (which is about literature). But even when it has genuine use, the ethical and environmental concerns remain. If I were to use AI on my research, it wouldn’t be my research anymore.”

Lack of clarity remains the biggest challenge for researchers
  • Nearly three-quarters (74%) report uncertainty around AI disclosure requirements, while only 36% actively keep records of their AI use during research. One respondent acknowledged:

“I tend to make sure my AI use is undetectable as I’m not sure what to disclose.”

  • 44% are concerned that disclosing AI use could negatively affect perceptions of their work鈥攎any of whom are in the arts and humanities鈥攚ith 35% finding AI disclosure to place an additional administrative burden on researchers.
Disclosure practices are inconsistent
  • 45% of researchers report their institution’s approach to AI use as unclear, while 43% report a somewhat or very enabling approach.
  • Looking at different research outputs over the last year, many researchers acknowledge that they do not fully disclose their use of AI tools:
    • 48% of those writing grant applications had not fully disclosed AI use, particularly in narrative drafting, translating or editing, and plain language summaries.
    • 46% of journal authors and 39% of book authors had not fully disclosed their AI use in preparing their manuscript, particularly in narrative drafting in each case. Only a third (30%) of book authors and 42% of journal authors were asked to attest whether AI was used in their manuscript submission.
    • 25% of peer reviewers had not fully disclosed AI use, particularly in language editing. 60% felt their AI use and disclosure complied with the reviewer policies, but the views were more mixed as to whether the journal policies on AI use were clear.

“Make the rules clear, coherent, and reasonable. Also, not all AI use should be disclosed (e.g., checking language), the same way that you do not disclose using a calculator. The question in the end is whether the author is the originator of the work in a deep sense. AI will be used.”

AI disclosure policies are unclear
  • Many authors want future AI disclosure policies to change, with some calling for clearer and more consistent guidelines on AI use and disclosure.
  • Others suggest policies should support a move towards the normalization of AI as a tool with minimal disclosure.
  • Looking at future AI disclosure policies to support researchers as readers of others’ work, many want to see standardized and mandatory AI disclosure introduced.

“The policy should protect normal responsible use of AI as a tool without forcing authors into vague or excessive reporting requirements.”

Read more about our , our , and .

The post Supporting researchers to disclose AI use with confidence appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Empowering higher education students with AI /news/empowering-higher-education-students-with-ai/ Wed, 09 Sep 2026 15:00:16 +0000 /?p=7754 We have introduced our AI Study Assistant across more Trove platforms, following its success on Law Trove.

The post Empowering higher education students with AI appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Students gathering round a laptop in a lecture hall

We’ve launched our AI Study Assistant on听,听, 补苍诲听, following the successful launch of the tool on听Law Trove in October 2025.

This means that all our Trove platforms now offer students enhanced functionality through AI to increase their efficiency when studying by helping them to find and engage with relevant content.

Troves鈥攊n business, law, politics, and science鈥攐ffer discipline-specific collections of higher education textbooks from across our market-leading lists. Rolling out the AI Study Assistant more widely means that students from these disciplines can generate accurate summaries, authoritative answers, and targeted quizzes to support understanding, revision, and exam preparation. Moreover, responses and quizzes generated by the assistant only draw from our trusted textbook content, guaranteeing that students are accessing reliable source material.

Building on the听Law Trove听AI Study Assistant

To expand the tool across our other Trove platforms, we further developed the assistant to meet user needs for听Science Trove.

It was vital that we included the images and figures featured in our textbooks in generated responses to inputted queries to fully illustrate the information provided. As with all other content, images and figures are only taken from the textbooks available on Science Trove and they are not generated by the assistant itself. They鈥檙e also accompanied by the caption used in the textbook to give further context.

As with听Law Trove, we have taken a conscientious approach to embedding AI into听Business,听Politics, 补苍诲听Science Trove by empowering users to develop the skills they need to apply critical thinking to their use of AI not just academically, but for their future careers through the . The module is available for all Trove users and covers generative AI fundamentals, academic integrity, critical thinking, and effective prompting, so users can use the AI Study Assistant responsibly and with confidence.

Shaped through user testing with lecturers and students, the tool has been designed with real teaching and learning needs at its heart, ensuring that Trove stands at the forefront of combining innovative technology with high-quality educative resources for higher education institutions and students.

We look forward to hearing how students interact with the tool across Trove in the new academic year and beyond. You can learn more about the development of the AI Study Assistant and the positive reception it has had on听Law Trove here.

The post Empowering higher education students with AI appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
OUP hosts AI in Education at 尤物视频 University summer school gathering /news/oup-hosts-ai-in-education-at-oxford-university-summer-school/ Fri, 07 Aug 2026 14:40:35 +0000 /?p=7493 We were proud to participate in and host the attendees of the AI in Education at 尤物视频 University Summer School.

The post OUP hosts AI in Education at 尤物视频 University summer school gathering appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
A man sitting at a long conference table. Everyone has laptops on the table. The man is looking towards someone presenting with a microphone in the background.

OUP Education and English Language Teaching teams were proud to participate in, and host, the attendees of the , in July.

The conference brought together people from the growing global community of researchers, academics, educators, industry leaders, and policymakers听united by the goal of tackling some of the biggest questions facing education today.

Dr Sara Ratner, of the University of 尤物视频鈥檚 Department of Education, designed a week-long programme in collaboration with the UK鈥檚 Department for Education, bringing together diverse perspectives from over a hundred representatives of academia, schools, government, industry, and civil society.

Discussions throughout the week brought together diverse perspectives, asking difficult questions about what AI should do in education and demanding evidence of its impact on learner outcomes.

AI in Education at 尤物视频 University logo on 尤物视频 Blue background

Sarah Ultsch, Director of Global Product at OUP, shared her impressions of the event: 鈥淭he debates and workshops of this summer school have been tremendously important, because the decisions we make now will shape the experience of learners for years to come.鈥�

She also highlighted her team鈥檚 recent launch of , the world鈥檚 first benchmark for evaluating AI in second language learning, culminating in the release of an open-source dataset for the benefit of the wider education and technology community.

During the week, summer school attendees were welcomed to OUP鈥檚 尤物视频 offices for an informal gathering and tour of the OUP Museum, which showcases key milestones and stories from our 500-year history. Liz Tyler, Managing Director of UK Education, welcomed participants and applauded the aims of the event that align with OUP Education鈥檚 commitments:

Headshot of Liz Tyler

Liz Tyler

Managing Director, UK Education

鈥淎t OUP, we develop services to support teachers and schools that are based on evidence and research, and we are deeply committed to working with the sector and with experts to establish an evidence base that will help us understand how AI might improve teaching and learning.鈥�

She also pointed towards recent research conducted by teams at OUP into student attitudes to the use of AI: the 补苍诲听 reports. These have shown how much students as well as their teachers need more data and evidence to guide the use of AI in developing cognitive skills and improving learning.听

As the AIEOU community continues to grow, the conversations and partnerships sparked during the summer school will continue to shape the understanding of AI鈥檚 role in education. Through ongoing research and collaboration with the University of 尤物视频, OUP remains committed to helping the sector navigate the opportunities and challenges of AI and focus on improved learner outcomes.

The post OUP hosts AI in Education at 尤物视频 University summer school gathering appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
New research shows teenagers are divided over AI use for schoolwork /news/new-research-shows-teenagers-are-divided-over-ai-use-for-schoolwork/ Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:43:22 +0000 /?p=6321 Our new research report, Navigating AI in Education, surveyed nearly 4,000 pupils in UK schools.

The post New research shows teenagers are divided over AI use for schoolwork appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

According to findings in exploring pupils’ perspectives on the role of AI in classrooms, teenagers are unclear over appropriate use of AI in their schoolwork.

We conducted research with almost 4,000 13-18-year-olds across the UK, revealing the different approaches that young people take to using AI in their schoolwork, and what roles they see AI playing education鈥攂oth for them and their teachers.

The report follows on from , which was one of the first pieces of UK research to hear directly from young people regarding their views on AI in education.

Some of our key findings:

Appropriate use of AI is a grey area

While only four in 10 (44%) think it is cheating to use AI to complete all of their homework, almost one in five also think it is cheating to simply ask any AI tool to give them homework tips.

Students are calling for more support from schools

Just 15% of students stated they have been given enough guidance.

77% would like to see their teachers use AI to support their class in lessons

Key areas include using AI to make complex work easier to understand and lesson planning.

Pupils emphasize their teacher’s unique value

73% pointed to a skill their teacher has which AI can never replace, such as personability, empathy, and human understanding.

Using AI in written tasks

In our qualitative studies, students were asked to complete a simple written exercise and offered the choice of using a generative AI tool if they wished. Of those who had access to AI, almost three quarters (72%) decided not to use it. Of those who didn鈥檛 have access, less than a quarter (23%) said they would have liked to have used an AI tool if they had been able to do so.

Young people do not use AI as a default for homework

The qualitative studies mirror survey findings, which highlight that young people do not use AI as a default for their homework, with only one in four (24%) regularly seeking out AI tools. Furthermore, one in three (34%) only use AI tools to help with their homework if suggested by their teachers听compared to听just听13% who are influenced by their friends.

Students are more excited than worried over impact of AI on their education

Four in 10 students (39%) are more excited than worried about the impact of AI on their education, compared to 16% who said they were more concerned and less than one in three (30%) who felt neither way.

What helps students learn more effectively when using AI?

When asked what helps them learn more effectively when using AI, the majority expressed preferences for AI tools that suggested tasks they can do to help them understand the subject better (44%) or asked them questions to help them reach the answer on their own (41%), compared to just one in five wanting an AI tool to give them the answer straight away.

Dr Alexandra Tomescu

Head of Product AI

“Whilst the research highlights that the appropriate use of AI is still a grey area for students, 颈迟鈥檚鈥�reassuring鈥�to see young听people鈥檚鈥�sophisticated鈥�attitude towards AI. Both the research and qualitative studies show AI is not necessarily a default for all students, and despite being excited about its impact on their education they still inherently value the role of their teachers and look to their school for guidance. It鈥檚 vital therefore that we support teachers with the resources and tools they need to responsibly guide their pupils and harness AI鈥檚 potential in the classroom.鈥�

Read the full report on Navigating AI in Education , and find out more about our updated AI resources and guidance .

The post New research shows teenagers are divided over AI use for schoolwork appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
尤物视频 Law Pro wins Gold for two SSP EPIC Awards /news/oxford-law-pro-wins-gold-in-two-2026-epic-awards/ Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:06:53 +0000 /?p=6304 尤物视频 Law Pro, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has won Gold in two 2026 EPIC Awards.

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro wins Gold for two SSP EPIC Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

We have been recognized with two awards at the 2026 Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) EPIC Awards Celebration, held on 28 May in California.

, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has won Gold in two categories: Hosting Platform Features and Branding.

The celebrate the remarkable achievements of individuals and teams who are advancing scholarly publishing through creativity, collaboration, and innovation. The Hosting Platform Features category highlights technical innovations that improve how scholarly content is hosted, accessed, and experienced, while the Branding category recognizes outstanding efforts to build and maintain a strong brand identity in scholarly publishing.

Mirkka Jokelainen, Product Portfolio Manager, said:

鈥淚t鈥檚 incredibly rewarding to see 尤物视频 Law Pro recognised across both platform innovation and branding. These awards reflect the collaboration and commitment of colleagues across OUP and our work with Silverchair and Baxter & Bailey. Our shared focus was to deliver real value to legal researchers and professionals.From the AI Research Assistant through to the product鈥檚 identity and positioning, the goal was to create something that is both highly functional and clearly signals what is unique about what OUP can offer. The SSP EPIC Gold Awards celebrate this work.鈥�

About the platform

Launched last year, 尤物视频 Law Pro听brings together more than 9,000 journal articles and over 600 award-winning, peer-reviewed books from our portfolio of authoritative and timely legal analysis, all on our 尤物视频 Academic platform.听

尤物视频 Law Pro听is powered by a conversational AI research assistant,听, making legal research more efficient without compromising on accuracy. Unlike generic AI search tools,听尤物视频 Law Pro听employs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks specifically tuned for legal content, ensuring responses are grounded exclusively in OUP鈥檚 authoritative materials.

The platform equips legal professionals with tools that match the realities of modern practice, and by reducing time spent on initial source identification, the AI assistant allows them to allocate more time to substantive analysis, strategic thinking, and client service.

For many years, we have served the academic market with legal research materials, developing a reputation for publishing the highest quality research from globally respected authors.听. Backed by our research and workshops, a process supported by legal technology expert Jenifer Swallow, we developed product branding and messaging to both reflect our established reputation and resonate with practitioners who may not have encountered OUP before.听

We worked with design agency Baxter & Bailey to develop a strong, modern visual identity, messaging, and a suite of imagery to bring 尤物视频 Law Pro听alive. Congratulations to all involved for this industry recognition.

Find out more about听.

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro wins Gold for two SSP EPIC Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Shaping Plan Assist AI tool with our global network of teachers /news/shaping-plan-assist-ai-tool-with-our-global-network-of-teachers/ Thu, 09 Apr 2026 15:23:12 +0000 /?p=6204 Plan Assist is designed to help teachers save time, personalize learning, and navigate challenges faced in the classroom.听

The post Shaping Plan Assist AI tool with our global network of teachers appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

We are pleased to announce the launch of the first in a series of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, designed to help teachers save time, personalize learning, and navigate some of the biggest challenges faced in the classroom.听

The tool,听, has been developed in partnership with leading global edtech provider , combining our pedagogical expertise with advanced AI technology.

With resource generation at its core,听Plan Assist听works to help teachers to create custom materials, such as lesson plans, glossaries, flashcards, and much more. When generating questions and answers through Avallain鈥檚 technology, it leverages trusted OUP content in the prompts to produce high-quality, curriculum-aligned outputs. By simplifying the planning process, it helps to save time for teachers while delivering results tailored 鈥嬧�嬧�媐or鈥� them and their students.鈥�

Ensuring value through teacher-led testing

The听technology that powers听Plan Assist听has already been recognized in major edtech awards, including BETT and the Learning Technology Awards.

Ahead of launch, we carried out a rigorous research and testing programme involving external subject matter experts, pilot trials with UK and international teachers, and extensive testing across four languages and multiple regions. This ensured the tool is robust, reliable, and provided real value for diverse classrooms, with participating teachers reporting听鈥媡hat听鈥媡he tool provides 鈥�a range of resources to support a teacher successfully in the classroom with ideas, content,听and activities鈥澨�and praising 鈥渋ts ability to instantly rewrite the same content for different audiences鈥�.

Teacher voices driving more effective support

To reflect the realities of classroom life, we gathered feedback from our global teacher network to provide insights into the pressures they are currently facing and what they need from digital platforms to work more efficiently.

Across the responses, three challenges were highlighted in particular:听

  • not having enough time and feeling over-stretched (74%)听
  • mental health and wellbeing (55%)听
  • budget restrictions (54%)听

Alongside these pressures, teachers also outlined what an effective digital platform must offer to truly support their work. Teachers said they needed:听

  • The ability to download, adapt, and print ready鈥憁ade teaching and planning resources (56%)听
  • Tools to support front鈥憃f鈥慶lass teaching using high鈥憅uality presentations (54%)听
  • Functionality to听monitor听and report on student progress (52%)听
  • AI features to help create lesson plans and teaching resources (50%)听

They also emphasized the importance of:听

  • Immediate, actionable feedback for learners听
  • Auto鈥憁arking and data tracking听
  • Exam听board or subject specificity听
  • Student interactivity and engagement features听

These insights provided a clear picture of the challenges teachers face and the digital capabilities they value most, shaping the focus of our support to ensure all products and services make a real difference.

Fiona Fortes

International Product Director in our Education division

鈥淭eachers everywhere are being asked to do more with less time. By combining OUP鈥檚 trusted content with responsible, innovative AI capabilities, we are giving teachers practical tools that make a real difference in the classroom. At OUP, our focus has always been to lead with learning and ensure that technology is there to support teachers. Our key principles听remain听at the heart of everything we do 鈥� creating resources that have real purpose and a human in听the听loop, while听prioritizing听quality content and pedagogy and safe, ethical use.

As we continue to innovate, we look for opportunities where technology can deliver meaningful, positive change within education, when developed responsibly and in collaboration with our global teaching community.鈥�

Monika Morawska, COO at听Avallain,听said:听

鈥淏uilding on our听expertise听in digital content creation technology and the rich feedback of the 60,000 highly engaged educators actively using our existing AI toolset听TeacherMatic, we are delighted to bring proven, practical, and ethical AI features to more teachers through Plan Assist. Our collaboration with OUP has been one of shared goals and values: putting humans, educational outcomes,听and creative, impactful content first.鈥�听

Plan Assist听will be available on听,听our online learning platform which supports teachers to save time and engage students with a range of resources. It will continue rolling out听to courses听in 2026.

You can find out more about Plan Assist .

The post Shaping Plan Assist AI tool with our global network of teachers appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
尤物视频 Law Pro recognized for two 2026 EPIC Awards /news/oxford-law-pro-recognized-for-two-2026-epic-awards/ Thu, 09 Apr 2026 10:34:48 +0000 /?p=6211 尤物视频 Law Pro, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has been nominated for two 2026 EPIC Awards.

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro recognized for two 2026 EPIC Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

We have been named a finalist for two 2026 EPIC Awards, presented by the .听

, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has been nominated for consideration in two categories: Hosting Platform Features and Branding.

The Hosting Platform Features category highlights technical innovations that improve how scholarly content is hosted, accessed, and experienced, while the Branding category recognizes outstanding efforts to build and maintain a strong brand identity in scholarly publishing.

About the platform

Launched less that one year ago,听尤物视频 Law Pro brings together more than 9,000 journal articles and over 600 award-winning, peer-reviewed books from our portfolio of authoritative and timely legal analysis, all on our 尤物视频 Academic platform.听

尤物视频 Law Pro is powered by a conversational AI research assistant, , making legal research more efficient without compromising on accuracy. Unlike generic AI search tools,听尤物视频 Law Pro employs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks specifically tuned for legal content, ensuring responses are grounded exclusively in OUP’s authoritative materials.

The platform equips legal professionals with tools that match the realities of modern practice, and by reducing time spent on initial source identification, the AI assistant allows them to allocate more time to substantive analysis, strategic thinking, and client service.

The branding

For many years, we have served the academic market with legal research materials, developing a reputation for publishing the highest quality research from globally respected authors.听. Backed by our research and workshops, a process supported by legal technology expert Jenifer Swallow, we developed product branding and messaging to both reflect our established reputation and resonate with practitioners who may not have encountered OUP before.听

We worked with design agency Baxter & Bailey to develop a strong, modern logo and colour palette, bold and confident messaging, and a suite of imagery to bring 尤物视频 Law Pro听alive.

“The breadth and quality of content on听尤物视频 Law Pro听is impressive and highly valuable for legal research.听Expert Essentials听stands out as a truly unique offering鈥擨 haven’t seen anything quite like it.”

Barrister, Hong Kong

Mirkka Jokelainen, Product Portfolio Manager, said:听

“These nominations recognize and reward the combined efforts of colleagues working with 尤物视频 Law Pro over time. It reflects strong execution underpinned by clear direction, a deep understanding of our users and customers, and the ability to carry that insight through to high-quality delivery enriched by OUP expertise at every step.”

The EPIC Awards celebrate teams and individuals in the publishing, information technology, and communications sectors for their significant contributions to scholarly communication through innovation, creativity, and dedication. Winners of the will be announced on 28 May.听

You can find out more about 尤物视频 Law Pro .

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro recognized for two 2026 EPIC Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Celebrating one year of 尤物视频 Intersections /news/celebrating-one-year-of-oxford-intersections/ Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:45:52 +0000 /?p=6073 We celebrate one year since the publication of the first collections of original interdisciplinary research within 尤物视频 Intersections.

The post Celebrating one year of 尤物视频 Intersections appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

听is our online interdisciplinary research resource, inviting academics and global experts to investigate the world’s most urgent and challenging subjects from all angles.

As we mark one year since the programme launched, we reflect on the over 300 articles we’ve published since then, covering over 250 subject areas from authors all over the world.

Intersections are organized by topic, inviting ideas from different disciplines to clash, complement, and counterpoint, prompting new viewpoints and questions. Explore some of the original content published so far in our first four topics:

AI in Society

Philipp Hacker, General Editor of AI in Society, and Chair for Law and Ethics of the Digital Society at European University Viadrina:

“AI in Society听investigates AI’s pervasive influence on our economic, legal, personal, and cultural spheres. It takes a unique format, in which contributors from various disciplines collaborate to chart both the promises and societal challenges of AI, with particular attention to generative AI models and their global impact. From my perspective as its General Editor,听AI in Society aims to serve as a reliable reference point for ongoing debates on how to align technological innovation with fundamental rights and societal values.”

Read Philipp’s full article

Read some of the published research

Growing Up with AI: Redefining Responsible AI for Children of Generation Beta in the Majority World

Amir Rahdari

Authentic Artificial Love

Ariela Tubert, Justin Tiehen

English in LLMs: The Role of AI in Avoiding Cultural Homogenization

Mirko Farina, Andrea Lavazza

Borders

Alexander Diener, Professor of Geography at the University of Kansas, and Joshua Hagen, Dean of the College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, General Editors of Borders:

“We hope readers will engage 尤物视频 Intersections: Borders to encounter new perspectives on a topics that is elemental to human experience and foundational to the form and function of power.”

Read some of the published research

Beyond Oral Tradition: Digitalizing Indigenous Environmental Knowledge for Climate Resilience in Africa

Dorcas Stella Shumba

Reconfiguring Borders: The Role of Conspiracy Theories in Shaping Knowledge and Information Flows in Online Discourse

Massimiliano Demata

Concepts from the Margins: Reimagining Governance and Belonging Through Border Children’s Lived Experiences

Ana Isabel Sandoval

Racism by Context

Meena Dhanda, General Editor of听Racism by Context听and Professor of Philosophy and Cultural Politics at the University of Wolverhampton:

“Combatting racism requires an unflinchingly analytical understanding of the roots, the history, the manifestation, the mechanisms, the proliferation, and the entanglement of its many forms within institutions and practices across all spheres of human interaction.听Racism by Context has undertaken this enormous challenge by bringing into conversation cutting-edge research from different global locations.”

Read some of the published research

Hair Discrimination and the Racialization of Black Young People’s Bodies: A Critical Analysis of Racism in U.K. School Settings

Siobhan O’Neill, Karis Campion, Sweta Rajan-Rankin

Soul Circuitry: Chronicles of Cyborgian Intelligence in Afrofuturism

Nettrice Gaskins

‘You are Nathan F*cking Shelley!’: Orientalism, White Saviourism, and the Radicalization of Nate in Ted Lasso

Adam Ehsan Ali, Matt Ventresca

Social Media in Society and Culture

Laeeq Khan, General Editor of Social Media in Society and Culture and Associate Professor in the School of Media Arts & Studies at Ohio University:

“Addressing today’s most pressing challenges requires a new approach to thinking. An interdisciplinary transformative approach can advance knowledge by exploiting and harmonizing the strengths of various disciplines within a unified framework. This approach deepens our collective understanding by bringing together the disparate and sometimes contradictory perspectives of many disciplines, all of which offer valuable insights.”

Read some of the published research

Sharenting on Instagram: A Study of Emotional Well-Being and Child Safety

P V Chandana, Velayutham Chandrasekharan, Tamilselvi Natarajan

Gaming on Social Media: An X- and YouTube-Driven Social Network Analysis of Minecraft Conversations

Mohd Ali Samsudin, Goh Kok Ming

Functional Aspects of Ritual in Digital Religion

Antonio Salvati

What’s coming next

In addition to continually developing our published topics, in the next year we’ll be launched intersections for听Environmental Change and Human Experience,听Gender Justice,听Climate Adaptation, 补苍诲听Cultures of Waste, with many more to come in the following years.

Discover the full collection .

The post Celebrating one year of 尤物视频 Intersections appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>