Research Archives - 尤物视频 /news/category/research/ Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:56:57 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.5 /wp-content/uploads/2025/10/favicon-1.png Research Archives - 尤物视频 /news/category/research/ 32 32 尤物视频 Law Pro recognized in the Legal Technology Awards /news/oxford-law-pro-finalist-legal-technology-awards-2026/ Fri, 11 Sep 2026 10:29:17 +0000 /?p=7767 尤物视频 Law Pro, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, is a finalist in the Legal Technology Awards.

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro recognized in the Legal Technology Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

We have been named a finalist in the .

, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has been recognized in the Responsible Use of AI in Legal Services category. This recognition follows two recent award wins in the Society for Scholarly Publishing’s EPIC Awards, for both Hosting Platform Features and Branding.

Hosted by Netlaw Media, the Legal Technology Awards recognize leadership, innovation, and technology as well as the individuals, teams, and suppliers transforming the future of legal services.

The Responsible Use of AI in Legal Services category recognizes organizations that demonstrate exemplary governance, robust risk management, and strong leadership in the ethical integration of artificial intelligence.

 

Mirkka Jokelainen, Product Portfolio Manager, said:

“Having made the list of finalists is such a meaningful recognition of OUP鈥檚 work with legal professionals, and means a lot for the whole 尤物视频 Law Pro team. AI is a tool which enables lawyers to benefit from our decades strong work of publishing the best legal commentary and analysis, and from the start, we have wanted to make sure the new capabilities enhance lawyers鈥� work and are easy to use. Responsible AI is about more than just technology. It’s about helping legal professionals access trusted expertise, realize value quickly, and adopt new capabilities with confidence.”

Winners of the Legal Technology Awards will be announced on 18 November.

About 尤物视频 Law Pro

Launched last year, 尤物视频 Law Pro brings together more than 9,000 journal articles and over 600 award-winning, peer-reviewed books from our portfolio of authoritative and timely legal analysis, all on our 尤物视频 Academic platform.

尤物视频 Law Pro is powered by a conversational AI research assistant, , making legal research more efficient without compromising on accuracy. Unlike generic AI search tools, 尤物视频 Law Pro employs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks specifically tuned for legal content, ensuring responses are grounded exclusively in OUP鈥檚 authoritative materials.

The platform equips legal professionals with tools that match the realities of modern practice, and by reducing time spent on initial source identification, the AI assistant allows them to allocate more time to substantive analysis, strategic thinking, and client service.

You can find out more about 尤物视频 Law Pro .

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro recognized in the Legal Technology Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Supporting researchers to disclose AI use with confidence /news/supporting-researchers-to-disclose-ai-use-with-confidence/ Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:00:00 +0000 /?p=7735 To help researchers to disclose their AI use confidently, we have updated our author and editor guidelines.

The post Supporting researchers to disclose AI use with confidence appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Transparent circles outlined in white over the top of a gradient of light colours

We have updated our author and editor guidelines on the responsible, appropriate, and transparent use of AI, including a policy outlining what AI use should be disclosed when preparing manuscripts for our journals.

In a recent global survey of more than 2,600 researchers, nearly three-quarters (74%) of respondents revealed they were unclear what AI use they should disclose, despite there being strong support for disclosure.

With 44% of researchers concerned that disclosing their use of AI will negatively impact how others view their work, and only 36% recording their AI use during their research, our survey emphasizes the growing gap between AI use and disclosure in academic research, and recognizes the need for clear disclosure policies.

As efforts continue to develop a , our new guidelines intend to support researchers to record and disclose their AI use with confidence. The updates to our guidelines focus on:

  • Disclosure of AI use across both books and journal articles, with authors expected to be transparent about any significant use of AI tools
  • Human oversight and accountability, with authors responsible for reviewing and verifying any AI-generated content
  • Protection of intellectual property and confidentiality to ensure care is taken when using AI tools with unpublished work, copyrighted material, or sensitive content.
Managing Director, Academic

David Clark

鈥淥ur research into AI disclosure follows our 2024 survey, which revealed a wide range of initial perceptions towards AI. Two years on, AI use is more widespread, but there remain major differences in how researchers are adopting, applying, and disclosing these tools.

鈥淎t OUP, we鈥檝e developed AI guidelines for authors with the view that the scholarship we publish must remain valued and protected. We regularly review these against industry guidelines and consider any feedback to ensure clear guidance for authors.

鈥淲e continue to prioritize working with the research community to develop clear publishing standards that support readers and authors in an AI-enabled world.鈥�

David Clark, Managing Director of OUP

Key findings from our survey:

AI is helping researchers
  • 64% of researchers report AI as beneficial to their research, with over two-thirds (68%) using AI chatbots on the open web for their research, and just under half (49%) using machine translation.
  • AI tools are most commonly used for discovering existing research (55%), summarizing existing research (46%), and editing the write-up of research (45%). Many (68%) agree that AI tools can reduce accessibility barriers, too.

“It reduces the time to locate arcane material. What might have taken hours/weeks in a library can be found instantaneously.”

  • However, 35% of those in the arts and humanities never use AI tools in their research, as opposed to 15% and 18% for STM and the social sciences, respectively.
Trust in AI is low
  • Only 20% trust AI-generated outputs. 37% of researchers who haven’t used AI for their research report concerns about accuracy, bias, and trustworthiness, and only 26% find AI-generated literature summaries to be accurate.

“My trust in AI outputs would increase if the responses consistently included clear and verifiable sources (such as case law, treaties, or academic references), showed transparent reasoning for how conclusions are reached, and accurately distinguished between established legal authority and interpretation or opinion. It would also help if the AI acknowledged uncertainty where appropriate and avoided overgeneralization, especially in complex legal or academic topics.”

  • However, 83% of those surveyed have established practices for checking citation sources generated by AI, and 80% always cross-check AI outputs for reliability.
Attitudes towards AI vary across disciplines and career stages
  • Based on respondents’ perceptions and behaviours towards AI, survey analysis identified five different profiles of researcher.
  • These range from the least trusting of AI鈥攖he ‘persistent sceptics’鈥攚ho are most commonly found in the arts and humanities, to the ‘carefree casuals’, who are less likely to record their own AI use and are more common among later career stage respondents than early career researchers.
  • Meanwhile, ‘frustrated trailblazers’ have benefited most from AI but are also the most concerned about the administrative burden of disclosing its use. They are more prevalent in the social sciences and STM disciplines, and among early career researchers.

“I am ethically opposed to AI. AI has been built on the stolen work of artists and writers. I am also concerned about the environmental consequences of AI. I grant that in some fields or in some inquiries, AI may be of some genuine use鈥攏ot in my research (which is about literature). But even when it has genuine use, the ethical and environmental concerns remain. If I were to use AI on my research, it wouldn’t be my research anymore.”

Lack of clarity remains the biggest challenge for researchers
  • Nearly three-quarters (74%) report uncertainty around AI disclosure requirements, while only 36% actively keep records of their AI use during research. One respondent acknowledged:

“I tend to make sure my AI use is undetectable as I’m not sure what to disclose.”

  • 44% are concerned that disclosing AI use could negatively affect perceptions of their work鈥攎any of whom are in the arts and humanities鈥攚ith 35% finding AI disclosure to place an additional administrative burden on researchers.
Disclosure practices are inconsistent
  • 45% of researchers report their institution’s approach to AI use as unclear, while 43% report a somewhat or very enabling approach.
  • Looking at different research outputs over the last year, many researchers acknowledge that they do not fully disclose their use of AI tools:
    • 48% of those writing grant applications had not fully disclosed AI use, particularly in narrative drafting, translating or editing, and plain language summaries.
    • 46% of journal authors and 39% of book authors had not fully disclosed their AI use in preparing their manuscript, particularly in narrative drafting in each case. Only a third (30%) of book authors and 42% of journal authors were asked to attest whether AI was used in their manuscript submission.
    • 25% of peer reviewers had not fully disclosed AI use, particularly in language editing. 60% felt their AI use and disclosure complied with the reviewer policies, but the views were more mixed as to whether the journal policies on AI use were clear.

“Make the rules clear, coherent, and reasonable. Also, not all AI use should be disclosed (e.g., checking language), the same way that you do not disclose using a calculator. The question in the end is whether the author is the originator of the work in a deep sense. AI will be used.”

AI disclosure policies are unclear
  • Many authors want future AI disclosure policies to change, with some calling for clearer and more consistent guidelines on AI use and disclosure.
  • Others suggest policies should support a move towards the normalization of AI as a tool with minimal disclosure.
  • Looking at future AI disclosure policies to support researchers as readers of others’ work, many want to see standardized and mandatory AI disclosure introduced.

“The policy should protect normal responsible use of AI as a tool without forcing authors into vague or excessive reporting requirements.”

Read more about our , our , and .

The post Supporting researchers to disclose AI use with confidence appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Publishing our 500th open access book /news/publishing-our-500th-open-access-book/ Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:33:04 +0000 /?p=6275 Our 500th book is an achievement that reflects our ongoing commitment to making high-quality research widely accessible.

The post Publishing our 500th open access book appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

We have published the 500th open access monograph on our platform鈥攁 landmark achievement that reflects our ongoing commitment to making high-quality research widely accessible to readers around the world.

This milestone underscores the dedication of our authors and editors in advancing open scholarship to support a more inclusive, collaborative community.

We have supported open access options for books since 2012, both by publishing open access frontlist titles and through converting selected backlist titles to open access. This work means we’re able to broaden the visibility, impact, and longevity of academic research across disciplines.听

We continue to explore the growth of our open access publishing programme: for example, last year we launched the where ten winning early career researchers have their books published open access; and through our pilot with , we’re making approximately 100 backlist books open access at no cost to authors.

But what does open access look like in practice, once a book is out in the world? Some of the authors behind 尤物视频 Academic open access books describe a common theme: reach. Publishing open access removes barriers and expands the audiences that scholarship can serve.

J. Timmons Roberts, Ittleson Professor of Environmental Studies and Sociology at the Institute at Brown for Environment and Society, Brown University, highlights what that global reach can mean:

“Open access allowed us to publicize our two assessment volumes on obstruction of climate action broadly and quickly, and to make it available all over the world at once.”

For Yujin Nagasawa, Kingfisher College Chair of the Philosophy of Religion and Ethics and Professor of Philosophy at the University of Oklahoma, open access connects directly to being read and engaged with worldwide:

“Publishing my books with OUP as open access titles has, in many ways, made that dream a reality.”

Editors also point to how open access can shape the longer arc of scholarship. Steven C. van den Heuvel, Professor of Systematic Theology at Evangelische Theologische Faculteit, Leuven, shared an early sign of impact for The 尤物视频 Compendium of Hope.

“Quantitatively, we can see that, despite it has been out only for a few months, it was already downloaded close to 8,000 times.”

Rebecca Lane

Senior Publisher

“It’s critically important that we offer a clear and easy route to open access publication for books and it’s fantastic to see more and more authors taking up the opportunity to make their work publicly available. We’re proud to celebrate this moment and look forward to publishing our next 500 open access books.”

Learn more about publishing your book open access with us .

The post Publishing our 500th open access book appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
尤物视频 Law Pro wins Gold for two SSP EPIC Awards /news/oxford-law-pro-wins-gold-in-two-2026-epic-awards/ Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:06:53 +0000 /?p=6304 尤物视频 Law Pro, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has won Gold in two 2026 EPIC Awards.

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro wins Gold for two SSP EPIC Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

We have been recognized with two awards at the 2026 Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) EPIC Awards Celebration, held on 28 May in California.

, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has won Gold in two categories: Hosting Platform Features and Branding.

The celebrate the remarkable achievements of individuals and teams who are advancing scholarly publishing through creativity, collaboration, and innovation. The Hosting Platform Features category highlights technical innovations that improve how scholarly content is hosted, accessed, and experienced, while the Branding category recognizes outstanding efforts to build and maintain a strong brand identity in scholarly publishing.

Mirkka Jokelainen, Product Portfolio Manager, said:

鈥淚t鈥檚 incredibly rewarding to see 尤物视频 Law Pro recognised across both platform innovation and branding. These awards reflect the collaboration and commitment of colleagues across OUP and our work with Silverchair and Baxter & Bailey. Our shared focus was to deliver real value to legal researchers and professionals.From the AI Research Assistant through to the product鈥檚 identity and positioning, the goal was to create something that is both highly functional and clearly signals what is unique about what OUP can offer. The SSP EPIC Gold Awards celebrate this work.鈥�

About the platform

Launched last year, 尤物视频 Law Pro听brings together more than 9,000 journal articles and over 600 award-winning, peer-reviewed books from our portfolio of authoritative and timely legal analysis, all on our 尤物视频 Academic platform.听

尤物视频 Law Pro听is powered by a conversational AI research assistant,听, making legal research more efficient without compromising on accuracy. Unlike generic AI search tools,听尤物视频 Law Pro听employs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks specifically tuned for legal content, ensuring responses are grounded exclusively in OUP鈥檚 authoritative materials.

The platform equips legal professionals with tools that match the realities of modern practice, and by reducing time spent on initial source identification, the AI assistant allows them to allocate more time to substantive analysis, strategic thinking, and client service.

For many years, we have served the academic market with legal research materials, developing a reputation for publishing the highest quality research from globally respected authors.听. Backed by our research and workshops, a process supported by legal technology expert Jenifer Swallow, we developed product branding and messaging to both reflect our established reputation and resonate with practitioners who may not have encountered OUP before.听

We worked with design agency Baxter & Bailey to develop a strong, modern visual identity, messaging, and a suite of imagery to bring 尤物视频 Law Pro听补濒颈惫别. Congratulations to all involved for this industry recognition.

Find out more about听.

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro wins Gold for two SSP EPIC Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
尤物视频 Law Pro recognized for two 2026 EPIC Awards /news/oxford-law-pro-recognized-for-two-2026-epic-awards/ Thu, 09 Apr 2026 10:34:48 +0000 /?p=6211 尤物视频 Law Pro, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has been nominated for two 2026 EPIC Awards.

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro recognized for two 2026 EPIC Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

We have been named a finalist for two 2026 EPIC Awards, presented by the .听

, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has been nominated for consideration in two categories: Hosting Platform Features and Branding.

The Hosting Platform Features category highlights technical innovations that improve how scholarly content is hosted, accessed, and experienced, while the Branding category recognizes outstanding efforts to build and maintain a strong brand identity in scholarly publishing.

About the platform

Launched less that one year ago,听尤物视频 Law Pro brings together more than 9,000 journal articles and over 600 award-winning, peer-reviewed books from our portfolio of authoritative and timely legal analysis, all on our 尤物视频 Academic platform.听

尤物视频 Law Pro is powered by a conversational AI research assistant, , making legal research more efficient without compromising on accuracy. Unlike generic AI search tools,听尤物视频 Law Pro employs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks specifically tuned for legal content, ensuring responses are grounded exclusively in OUP’s authoritative materials.

The platform equips legal professionals with tools that match the realities of modern practice, and by reducing time spent on initial source identification, the AI assistant allows them to allocate more time to substantive analysis, strategic thinking, and client service.

The branding

For many years, we have served the academic market with legal research materials, developing a reputation for publishing the highest quality research from globally respected authors.听. Backed by our research and workshops, a process supported by legal technology expert Jenifer Swallow, we developed product branding and messaging to both reflect our established reputation and resonate with practitioners who may not have encountered OUP before.听

We worked with design agency Baxter & Bailey to develop a strong, modern logo and colour palette, bold and confident messaging, and a suite of imagery to bring 尤物视频 Law Pro听补濒颈惫别.

“The breadth and quality of content on听尤物视频 Law Pro听is impressive and highly valuable for legal research.听Expert Essentials听stands out as a truly unique offering鈥擨 haven’t seen anything quite like it.”

Barrister, Hong Kong

Mirkka Jokelainen, Product Portfolio Manager, said:听

“These nominations recognize and reward the combined efforts of colleagues working with 尤物视频 Law Pro over time. It reflects strong execution underpinned by clear direction, a deep understanding of our users and customers, and the ability to carry that insight through to high-quality delivery enriched by OUP expertise at every step.”

The EPIC Awards celebrate teams and individuals in the publishing, information technology, and communications sectors for their significant contributions to scholarly communication through innovation, creativity, and dedication. Winners of the will be announced on 28 May.听

You can find out more about 尤物视频 Law Pro .

The post 尤物视频 Law Pro recognized for two 2026 EPIC Awards appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Keeping world-leading international law resource听open access /news/keeping-world-leading-international-law-resource-open-access/ Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:57:05 +0000 /?p=6087 The Max Planck听Encyclopedia听of Public International Law听will remain freely available for another year through the Subscribe to Open model.

The post Keeping world-leading international law resource听open access appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

罢丑别鈥�� has reached its goal for renewals and will continue to publish on a Subscribe to Open model, through to at least March 2027.

罢丑别听Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law听is听the leading resource in the field,听containing听peer-reviewed articles on every aspect of international law鈥攁听discipline听which听provides a common legal framework for the鈥痺hole world.

By converting听this听comprehensive, analytical resource听to听an open access,听Subscribe to Open model,听we听have made it possible for students, scholars, practitioners, and governments听worldwide听to access this content freely without financial barriers.鈥�

Subscribe to Open in practice听

罢丑别听Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International听Law听is听OUP鈥檚听first experiment with the Subscribe to Open model – a model听typically applied to journals rather than books. Thanks to the support of our听institutional and library听customers, this valuable content is freely accessible听to all听for a second year.

As a result of the听Subscribe to听Open model, usage of the encyclopaedia has increased听substantially听from听2024 to 2025:

  • An increase in usage by 1,291%
  • An鈥痠ncrease in usage鈥痜rom low- and middle-income countries鈥痓y听556%听鈥�
  • Access from鈥痷sers in听235 鈥痙ifferent鈥痶erritories around the world, an听increase听from 199,听including听all听196 United Nations member states.

Professor Anne Peters, Director at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg, and General Editor of听the鈥�Max Planck听Encyclopedia听of Public International Law, said:

鈥淲e are delighted to have this opportunity to听participate听in a pioneering听open听access听project, particularly in view of the foundational role played by the Max Planck Society in launching the move towards open scholarship.听Open听access听can contribute to epistemic justice and pluralism鈥攁nd what we call 鈥渆ncyclopaedic knowledge鈥� should not only be distributed听freely, but听also be built up from a globally diverse set of standpoints.鈥�听

Rhodri Jackson, Director of Open Access Publishing and Strategy, shared:

鈥�Innovation in open access models is in line with our mission: not only to publish excellent research and scholarship but to make it available worldwide. We are committed to learning from all our initiatives鈥攕uccessful and less successful鈥攁nd to sharing our results transparently. The first year of Subscribe to Open for the Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law has been a great success and we鈥檙e excited to see what happens in year two.鈥�

While听we have reached our goal for renewals this year, we still need to reach our renewal goals annually to keep this resource听open access. By renewing your subscription, you help to ensure that this valuable resource听remains听open and accessible to all, year after year.

Find more information, including about renewals, .

The post Keeping world-leading international law resource听open access appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Celebrating one year of 尤物视频 Intersections /news/celebrating-one-year-of-oxford-intersections/ Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:45:52 +0000 /?p=6073 We celebrate one year since the publication of the first collections of original interdisciplinary research within 尤物视频 Intersections.

The post Celebrating one year of 尤物视频 Intersections appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

听is our online interdisciplinary research resource, inviting academics and global experts to investigate the world’s most urgent and challenging subjects from all angles.

As we mark one year since the programme launched, we reflect on the over 300 articles we’ve published since then, covering over 250 subject areas from authors all over the world.

Intersections are organized by topic, inviting ideas from different disciplines to clash, complement, and counterpoint, prompting new viewpoints and questions. Explore some of the original content published so far in our first four topics:

AI in Society

Philipp Hacker, General Editor of AI in Society, and Chair for Law and Ethics of the Digital Society at European University Viadrina:

“AI in Society听investigates AI’s pervasive influence on our economic, legal, personal, and cultural spheres. It takes a unique format, in which contributors from various disciplines collaborate to chart both the promises and societal challenges of AI, with particular attention to generative AI models and their global impact. From my perspective as its General Editor,听AI in Society aims to serve as a reliable reference point for ongoing debates on how to align technological innovation with fundamental rights and societal values.”

Read Philipp’s full article

Read some of the published research

Growing Up with AI: Redefining Responsible AI for Children of Generation Beta in the Majority World

Amir Rahdari

Authentic Artificial Love

Ariela Tubert, Justin Tiehen

English in LLMs: The Role of AI in Avoiding Cultural Homogenization

Mirko Farina, Andrea Lavazza

Borders

Alexander Diener, Professor of Geography at the University of Kansas, and Joshua Hagen, Dean of the College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, General Editors of Borders:

“We hope readers will engage 尤物视频 Intersections: Borders to encounter new perspectives on a topics that is elemental to human experience and foundational to the form and function of power.”

Read some of the published research

Beyond Oral Tradition: Digitalizing Indigenous Environmental Knowledge for Climate Resilience in Africa

Dorcas Stella Shumba

Reconfiguring Borders: The Role of Conspiracy Theories in Shaping Knowledge and Information Flows in Online Discourse

Massimiliano Demata

Concepts from the Margins: Reimagining Governance and Belonging Through Border Children’s Lived Experiences

Ana Isabel Sandoval

Racism by Context

Meena Dhanda, General Editor of听Racism by Context听and Professor of Philosophy and Cultural Politics at the University of Wolverhampton:

“Combatting racism requires an unflinchingly analytical understanding of the roots, the history, the manifestation, the mechanisms, the proliferation, and the entanglement of its many forms within institutions and practices across all spheres of human interaction.听Racism by Context has undertaken this enormous challenge by bringing into conversation cutting-edge research from different global locations.”

Read some of the published research

Hair Discrimination and the Racialization of Black Young People’s Bodies: A Critical Analysis of Racism in U.K. School Settings

Siobhan O’Neill, Karis Campion, Sweta Rajan-Rankin

Soul Circuitry: Chronicles of Cyborgian Intelligence in Afrofuturism

Nettrice Gaskins

‘You are Nathan F*cking Shelley!’: Orientalism, White Saviourism, and the Radicalization of Nate in Ted Lasso

Adam Ehsan Ali, Matt Ventresca

Social Media in Society and Culture

Laeeq Khan, General Editor of Social Media in Society and Culture and Associate Professor in the School of Media Arts & Studies at Ohio University:

“Addressing today’s most pressing challenges requires a new approach to thinking. An interdisciplinary transformative approach can advance knowledge by exploiting and harmonizing the strengths of various disciplines within a unified framework. This approach deepens our collective understanding by bringing together the disparate and sometimes contradictory perspectives of many disciplines, all of which offer valuable insights.”

Read some of the published research

Sharenting on Instagram: A Study of Emotional Well-Being and Child Safety

P V Chandana, Velayutham Chandrasekharan, Tamilselvi Natarajan

Gaming on Social Media: An X- and YouTube-Driven Social Network Analysis of Minecraft Conversations

Mohd Ali Samsudin, Goh Kok Ming

Functional Aspects of Ritual in Digital Religion

Antonio Salvati

What’s coming next

In addition to continually developing our published topics, in the next year we’ll be launched intersections for听Environmental Change and Human Experience,听Gender Justice,听Climate Adaptation, and听Cultures of Waste, with many more to come in the following years.

Discover the full collection .

The post Celebrating one year of 尤物视频 Intersections appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Launching the 尤物视频 Test of English Learner Corpora competition /news/launching-the-oxford-test-of-english-learner-corpora-competition/ Wed, 18 Feb 2026 11:42:45 +0000 /?p=5944 The 尤物视频 Test of English Learner Corpora is a rich linguistic resource, with a new competition announced for researchers.

The post Launching the 尤物视频 Test of English Learner Corpora competition appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

We have launched a new 尤物视频 Test of English Learner Corpora (OTELC) research competition, designed to support emerging researchers and showcase innovative academic work using learner data from the .

The to students currently studying for a Master’s degree in Linguistics, Corpus Linguistics, or Language Assessment. Entrants will be asked to submit a research proposal outlining their project and clearly explaining how the OTELC will be used as primary data to support their methodological approach and research objectives. A reference letter from an academic supervisor or course leader will also be required.

The OTELC is a collection of written and spoken texts produced by test takers who sit the Speaking and Writing modules of the 尤物视频 Test of English. These responses are transcribed, structured, linked with metadata (such as first language, age, gender, CEFR level), and are annotated for error types.

Developed as monitor corpora, the OTELC is designed to grow as new test taker responses are added. It provides authentic samples of learner language, offering insights into how learners of English produce written and spoken texts and the linguistic features they use.

As a rich linguistic resource, the OTELC enables research across applied linguistics, language assessment, and English language teaching, giving researchers opportunities to examine patterns in learner performance, explore the challenges faced by test takers, and generate findings that can inform pedagogy and assessment research.

Anthony Green

Research Director, English Assessment

“The 尤物视频 Test of English Learner Corpora competition represents an exciting step in opening up our rich learner data to the next generation of researchers. By supporting postgraduate students, we’re not only encouraging innovative academic work but also strengthening the bridge between assessment research and real-world classroom impact.“

on 15 February 2026, with the deadline for proposals and reference letter submission falling on 31 May 2026. We will announce shortlisted project proposals in July.

From the submissions received, the strongest applications will be selected for the next stage. The overall winner will receive an iPad Air and will have their research published as part of our collection, giving valuable visibility to their work within the English language teaching and language assessment community.

You can read more details on the competition, eligibility criteria, and submission guidance , and find out more about the 尤物视频 Test of English .

The post Launching the 尤物视频 Test of English Learner Corpora competition appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>
Why are universities rethinking English language assessment? /news/why-are-universities-rethinking-english-language-assessment/ Tue, 17 Feb 2026 09:56:40 +0000 /?p=5967 Our new whitepaper examines how traditional English testing often fails to reflect skills students need for academic and professional success.

The post Why are universities rethinking English language assessment? appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>

As universities worldwide reconsider how English proficiency is assessed, traditional one-size-fits-all tests often fail to reflect the real skills students need for academic and professional success.

Responding to this, we’re proud to have launched a whitepaper today, exploring the topic of .

Created in partnership with听, our new whitepaper examines:

  • What skills institutions really value to ensure academic and social preparedness
  • Why conventional English tests are falling short
  • How technology and AI are transforming assessment
  • What universities should look for in effective language testing.

The findings of the whitepaper reinforce our commitment to delivering English language assessment that is adaptive, authentic, and aligned with the real communication demands of academic and professional environments. It also demonstrates how the continues to evolve to meet the expectations of learners, educators, and universities worldwide.

Sara Pierson

Managing Director, English Assessment

“There鈥檚听growing recognition that assessment must reflect real-world communication and the diverse ways students use language in academic and professional settings.听As the whitepaper sets out, the push for a more听holistic approach听to English-language testing recognizes that language is vital in supporting meaningful engagement with the world around us, not a standalone exercise.“

On 11 March 2026, together with听Times Higher Education, bringing together a panel of experts to explore the critical components for effective language assessment today, and how recognizing the right English proficiency tests can promote successful learner outcomes.

As the needs of learners and institutions evolve, English proficiency tests must actively enable student success, including integrated, task-based designs that mirror real-life language use. A more holistic and adaptive assessment can ensure that test preparation builds skills that translate to professional, academic, and social success, while offering a baseline for targeted support and developmental guidance for students鈥� academic journey.

Anthony Green

Research Director, English Assessment

“As the university experience becomes increasingly digital, interdisciplinary, and collaborative, we have to ask ourselves whether current English-language tests are truly measuring the communication skills students need for today’s world. It’s time to rethink what effective assessment looks like.“

You can download the full whitepaper and register for the webinar .

The post Why are universities rethinking English language assessment? appeared first on 尤物视频.

]]>